Dortch Consulting Group -- 8 Points to Consider About Board Self-Assessment
Dortch Consulting Group

Dortch Transition Consulting

Dortch Team Workshops
Dortch Meeting Facilitation

 

Building Engaged Boards and Effective Teams

 >   > 

 

Board Evaluations
8 Points to Consider

  1. Why do an evaluation?

  • To ensure the board of directors provides maximum value to shareholders

  • To identify issues that are negatively affecting the board's performance

  • To meet current regulations and best practice recommendations

  1. What should the evaluation include?

  • An assessment of the entire board's performance 

  • An assessment of each committee's performance 

  • Optional: An assessment of each director's performance. 

Each assessment should be summarized in a separate report that includes insights and recommendations.

  1. How should the information be collected?

There are several ways:

  • Self-assessment surveys and questionnaires 

  • Interviews with board members

  • Observations (typically used in long-term assignments)

  • A combination of these approaches

  1. Who should collect and analyze the information?

The most appropriate approach depends on the needs and resources of the organization and its board.

  • The governance committee or the organization's human resources executive

  • The organization's attorney

  • A specialized consulting firm 

  • A large consulting or legal firm 

  1. Who should see what?

  • All board members should receive a copy of the overall "board performance" report.

  • Committee reports can be given to the specific committees, unless the board wants to distribute them more widely. 

  • Individual reports are shared only with the individual. 

  1. What should be done with the results?

Step one: Present the Board with the findings and recommendations from the evaluation. 

Step two: Discuss the results and how they influence goals for the coming year. 

Step three: Instruct the governance committee to create and implement a plan to address each resulting goal. The governance committee may:

  • Set objectives and timelines for board approval and gain commitment from each board member (an essential step)

  • Address critical issues

  • Address any low performing directors or committee chairs

  • Identify different assumptions that board members have about the board's operations

  • Resolve conflicts

  • Plan board and executive management succession

  • Provide feedback of each committee's performance

Individual reports can shed light on how a board member's performance is perceived by other board members and provide a basis for the individual's development.

  1. What about cost? 

The cost varies based on the option you select.

Least expensive: the governance committee or the organization's human resource leader develops and administers a survey. However, they may lack the time and/or the expertise necessary to achieve an unbiased evaluation.

Next least expensive: The assessment is handled by a specialized consulting firm, the organization's outside attorney, or a combination of the two. 

Most expensive option: A large consulting or legal firm.

Other factors that affect the price include:

  • The number of board members

  • Final product desired

  • Travel time and expenses

  1. What about legal issues?

Conducting evaluations, as recommended: 

  • Reflects a board that is innovative, proactive and interested in looking out for the shareholders' benefit.

  • Reflects a board that is strongly interested in discovering and taking action on any potential legal issue.

  • Demonstrates independence in board processes and board judgment.

 

Our Board Evaluation
Process >


Case Study:
Dealing with Marginal or Disruptive Board Member >


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
  Copyright © 2004, 2005 Dortch Consulting Group. All Rights Reserved. | Contact: 702.734.1955